Animal Rights Language
I did not write this post. This has come to me on one of the email lists I am on and I wanted to post it here. All comments are welcomed but please keep it peaceful.
Watch your language!
Written by: “Charlotte McGowan”
Thu Nov 20, 2008 6:27 pm (PST)
I would like to make some observations about language. The animal rights people want to change language to help them in their quest to give animals legal standing and we are helping them. Time to stop.
Adopting - this is a term used for humans. We don’t adopt animals. Sorry, rescues don’t offer dogs for adoption either. They offer them for placement. They re-home them. But they aren’t adopted. If money changes hands, they sell them. A shelter here in Mass grosses over $700,000 a year selling imported shelter strays, mutts and feral street dogs. They go for $350 a pop. They don’t rescue in my opinion, they keep product in the store! They have a big so-called not for profit 501(c)3 business. If we start calling it like it is (and I do) believe me you are going to feel so much better. Now if a purebred rescue collects money from someone for a dog, they are taking money as a placement or re-homing fee or they are asking to be reimbursed for expenses related to the re-homing. If you need it to be warmer and fuzzier, it is humane re-homing. Let’s drop adoption. Animal rights people love us if we help them. Let’s stop helping them.
Fostering - This is a term used for children taken by the state and put in the care of people not their parents. We don’t foster dogs. We provide temporary care for displaced dogs. Sorry if you find that awkward but we can all benefit by retraining ourselves.
Guardian - legal term used for the legally responsible person caring for a minor child or incapacitated person. I think we get this one. We have to fight Guardian language in animal ordinances tooth and nail because a guardian takes away ownership from the owner. If you own a dog it is yours. If you are a guardian, you are not an owner. You are a person or entity with legal care responsibility. If dogs have guardians instead of owners, we no longer have ownership rights.
Puppy Mill- There is no such thing. Puppy mill is a slur, like the “n…..” word. Let’s stop using it. We hate substandard kennels. We want all dogs to be kept well. Well kept dogs are well kept dogs whether they are in kennels or in homes. It isn’t about how many dogs there are it is about how well they are kept. HSU$ calls all farms factory farms. When have you ever heard them talk about or care about family farms? Now they call all breeders puppy mills. They try to mumble in a remote footnote that there might be some good breeders but for them it is all about shelters and if not shelters rescues. Do you get it? They use language to slander all animal use and all dog breeders. Their mumbled lip service doesn’t fly with me.
Rescue - what is a rescue? To me, IMHO, it is taking on the care and rehoming of a dog in a true need situation. This includes when the owners are incapacitated or die, have to go into a care facility like a nursing home, lose their home, etc. When some one just wants to dump a dog because they are tired of it, that’s a disposal job. I am not nice to such people. When purebred rescues go into auctions and buy dogs I call that just plain dumb. That is assisting and supporting commercial breeders. Some people may not agree but supporting this sort of thing does absolutely nothing for purebred dogs.
Words that do not belong in the language at all - furbabies, furkids, fur children. All of these terms make animals into children who (gasp) need guardians, adoption and fostering.
So I hope you watch your language!
Charlotte McGowan
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


















November 26th, 2008 at 5:43 pm
Charlotte,
Very well said and right on target.
Barbara
November 26th, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Bravo! Well-said, I must say! It’s about time that someone pointed out the REAL reason behind this new animal-rights language: to distance humans from the concept of owning and keeping pets. The whole “guardian” thing is especially disturbing, since as you stated, it means that the animal is NOT YOURS. You’re just caring for it, which means your Constitutional rights as an owner are forfeited, and the government can take that animal anytime they please, for any reason they please. With groups like the HSUS and PeTA pushing for the extinction of all domesticated animals, this plays right into their nefarious goals.
November 26th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
Thank you both for your comments. It is very much apprecaited.
When I saw this post from Charlotte McGowan I knew it was very important to put this on the blog for those who aren’t in the “show” world to read.
Happy Thanksgiving!
November 30th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
This was forwarded to me and I couldn’t believe how stupid you sound. I do rescue, I adopt out animals. I foster in my home. These are all words that apply to the animals in my care and I am not attempting to humanize them. I do not sell these animals and my rescue never makes a profit. I won’t use cutesy words like fur-kids or critters but saying that those who work to rehome pets are just selling them is a slap in the face to the hundreds of lost souls that have lived at my half-way house and been adopted into loving families. If we were just selling we wouldn’t be able to turn away all of the unsuitable homes that we do.
December 18th, 2008 at 10:19 am
First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more.